Skip to main content

EOTO - The Fair Housing Act of 1968

 The Fair Housing Act of 1968


    Prior to The Fair Housing Act of 1968, African Americans, in addition to many other minority groups, were being denied basic housing rights. These denials resulted in difficulty finding housing in decent, let alone desirable locations. Minority groups struggled when it came to buying and renting homes. Landlords and sellers would raise prices, set different terms of agreement, use different qualification criteria, or simply refuse to allow these people to live in the available houses due to things such as race, sex, or religion. 

    Prior to the passing of The Fair Housing Act of 1968, two previous versions of this law were rejected by Congress. The rejection of the two prior versions lead people to believe that a third try at passing the law would be an incredibly long shot. After the assignation of MLK things really took a turn. On April 11, 1968 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as The Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited the discrimination concerning the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin, sex, handicap, and family status. This was the third major Civil Rights Act passed during the 60's, signifying great advancements on the American front in terms of racial equality. The Fair Housing Act was passed with the hopes of creating equality when it comes to the ability to purchase and rent homes. This also was enacted in order to integrate and diversify housing communities, developments, and residential facilities. 

    The act covers most housing structures and types. The only exempt possibilities are owner occupied buildings with less than four units, single family homes sold or rented by an owner without an agent, and housing operated by religious organizations or private clubs that limit occupancy to solely members. Regardless of the exemptions, the act provided security to minority groups ensuring that if they were financially capable and housing was available, they would be able to obtain it without discrimination. 

    The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited many forms of discrimination in regards to buying and renting homes. These prohibitions included things such as refusing to rent to a certain kind of person, setting different terms and conditions based up the tenant or buyer, imposing varying prices due to buyer/renter, using a different set of qualifications for certain people, discouraging a purchase due personal characteristics, and denying a mortgage due to things such as race, sex, or religion. By prohibiting these forms of discrimination it again granted minorities the ability to live in desirable locations with sensible amenities. 

    Even today, there is discrepancies in certain neighborhoods, and even homeownership as a whole between minority groups and whites in America. African American homeownership is significantly lower than that of white people. Just 47% of African Americans own their homes, whereas 75% of white people own their homes. Minorities tend to live in less desirable housing communities, with limited access to luxury amenities. According to the National Housing Conference, 64% of people receiving housing assistance are non-white. So while this Act has made a tremendous impact on minorities, and African Americans in particular, there is still a ways to go. 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

EOTO Recap - California Reagents v Bakke

 California Reagents v Bakke Mock Trial Recap     In class we had the opportunity to go through the motions of the California Reagents v. Bakke trial. This was a very prominent case, signifying whether affirmative action and minority quotas were Constitutional and would be permitted to continue on within schools and corporations. The case began when Allan Bakke; veteran, NASA intern, and med-school applicant, was denied twice from University of California at Davis. Bakke reportedly had stand out MCAT scores, a high GPA, and decent interviews and was well rounded between the participation in the U.S. Military as well as NASA.      The side of Bakke deemed racial quotas unconstitutional. They said that affirmative action makes it unfair for students who do not fit the certain group standards to be admitted. Based upon solely numerical values such as grades and GPA, Bakke was more than qualified to be admitted to the medical school. Due to...
Post a Comment
Read more

EOTO Recap - Brown vs. Board

 EOTO Recap          While the Brown vs  Board of Education case was going through trial, there was many other  significant events happening throughout the United States. Some of these events were incredible and made strides to create equality among the races, other events took us back a multitude of steps and are very low points in our history.     The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a major event during the Civil Rights Era. It consisted of African Americans simply refusing to use public transport such as busses. This sparked with the Rosa Parks incident. This bus boycott went on from December 5, 1955 to December 20, 1956; over a full year of boycotting this form of public transportation. Activists met after Rosa Parks was arrested and decided that this would be the simple but productive stance they would take on the issue.      Another significant movement that went on was the March on Washington . This was a...
Post a Comment
Read more

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts     While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives.  Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery.   The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...
Post a Comment
Read more