Skip to main content

EOTO - The Fair Housing Act of 1968

 The Fair Housing Act of 1968


    Prior to The Fair Housing Act of 1968, African Americans, in addition to many other minority groups, were being denied basic housing rights. These denials resulted in difficulty finding housing in decent, let alone desirable locations. Minority groups struggled when it came to buying and renting homes. Landlords and sellers would raise prices, set different terms of agreement, use different qualification criteria, or simply refuse to allow these people to live in the available houses due to things such as race, sex, or religion. 

    Prior to the passing of The Fair Housing Act of 1968, two previous versions of this law were rejected by Congress. The rejection of the two prior versions lead people to believe that a third try at passing the law would be an incredibly long shot. After the assignation of MLK things really took a turn. On April 11, 1968 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968, also known as The Fair Housing Act of 1968, which prohibited the discrimination concerning the sale, rental, and financing of housing based on race, religion, national origin, sex, handicap, and family status. This was the third major Civil Rights Act passed during the 60's, signifying great advancements on the American front in terms of racial equality. The Fair Housing Act was passed with the hopes of creating equality when it comes to the ability to purchase and rent homes. This also was enacted in order to integrate and diversify housing communities, developments, and residential facilities. 

    The act covers most housing structures and types. The only exempt possibilities are owner occupied buildings with less than four units, single family homes sold or rented by an owner without an agent, and housing operated by religious organizations or private clubs that limit occupancy to solely members. Regardless of the exemptions, the act provided security to minority groups ensuring that if they were financially capable and housing was available, they would be able to obtain it without discrimination. 

    The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited many forms of discrimination in regards to buying and renting homes. These prohibitions included things such as refusing to rent to a certain kind of person, setting different terms and conditions based up the tenant or buyer, imposing varying prices due to buyer/renter, using a different set of qualifications for certain people, discouraging a purchase due personal characteristics, and denying a mortgage due to things such as race, sex, or religion. By prohibiting these forms of discrimination it again granted minorities the ability to live in desirable locations with sensible amenities. 

    Even today, there is discrepancies in certain neighborhoods, and even homeownership as a whole between minority groups and whites in America. African American homeownership is significantly lower than that of white people. Just 47% of African Americans own their homes, whereas 75% of white people own their homes. Minorities tend to live in less desirable housing communities, with limited access to luxury amenities. According to the National Housing Conference, 64% of people receiving housing assistance are non-white. So while this Act has made a tremendous impact on minorities, and African Americans in particular, there is still a ways to go. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Theme Song

 Theme Song     Music has played a very major role in my life. Many memories, both good and bad, have a musical association for me. I think when you take the time to understand the lyrics of the song, you can find out more about yourself and your views on life. When trying to choose a theme song, I struggled with selecting just one. I believe that I embody many aspects of various songs and genres, and am grateful that I am capable of seeing parts of myself in a multitude of lights. I love to travel, my bags are always packed, and the feeling of freedom is something so pivotal to who I am. I believe there's more to life than the sole aspect of working day in and day out. I also am a strong believer in the idea that you can learn more through travel, than in a classroom. In that aspect, I do not mean traveling to five star resorts and luxurious beaches, I mean travel to touch every part of the world; the good, the bad, and the ugly, meet a variety of people, ...

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts     While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives.  Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery.   The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...