Plessy vs. Ferguson - What I Learned

Plessy vs. Ferguson - Learning From A Mock Trial Case

Plessy versus Ferguson was a landmark case, changing practices and viewpoints regarding racial segregation all across the United States in the year 1896. The decision regarding the case allowed for racial segregation to continue across America, depleting the progressive rights and opportunities for African Americans. This decision further pushed distinction between public amenities for blacks and whites.

The case initiated when Homer Plessy, a man having just 1/8 African American in his blood, rode on a train car that was for white people only. Plessy was very fair skinned, and often "passed" as white. Plessy purchased a first class train ticket from the station and boarded the "White's Only" car. Plessy was arrested when he refused to move to the "African American" train car. He was charged under the Separate Car Act, and his case eventually made way to the U.S Supreme Court on April 13, 1896.

Plessy argued against Judge John Ferguson under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment, granting full and equal rights to African Americans. The court ruled that while the 14th Amendment hoped to create "absolute equality of the two races before the law", that could only be stretched so far as to political and civil laws, whereas social laws may be mildly exempt from this.

This court ruling basically allowed for the justice system to turn a blind eye to racial segregation in public settings. The Separate but Equal Doctrine would continue to haunt blacks and allow for them to experience blatant inferior treatment on a daily basis. This would be the common practice up until 1954, when the Brown vs Board of Education case would arise.

Comments

EOTO Recap - California Reagents v Bakke

California Reagents v Bakke Mock Trial Recap In class we had the opportunity to go through the motions of the California Reagents v. Bakke trial. This was a very prominent case, signifying whether affirmative action and minority quotas were Constitutional and would be permitted to continue on within schools and corporations. The case began when Allan Bakke; veteran, NASA intern, and med-school applicant, was denied twice from University of California at Davis. Bakke reportedly had stand out MCAT scores, a high GPA, and decent interviews and was well rounded between the participation in the U.S. Military as well as NASA. The side of Bakke deemed racial quotas unconstitutional. They said that affirmative action makes it unfair for students who do not fit the certain group standards to be admitted. Based upon solely numerical values such as grades and GPA, Bakke was more than qualified to be admitted to the medical school. Due to...

EOTO Recap - Brown vs. Board

EOTO Recap While the Brown vs Board of Education case was going through trial, there was many other significant events happening throughout the United States. Some of these events were incredible and made strides to create equality among the races, other events took us back a multitude of steps and are very low points in our history. The Montgomery Bus Boycott was a major event during the Civil Rights Era. It consisted of African Americans simply refusing to use public transport such as busses. This sparked with the Rosa Parks incident. This bus boycott went on from December 5, 1955 to December 20, 1956; over a full year of boycotting this form of public transportation. Activists met after Rosa Parks was arrested and decided that this would be the simple but productive stance they would take on the issue. Another significant movement that went on was the March on Washington . This was a...

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives. Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...

Abby Weiss

Search This Blog