Skip to main content

Brown vs. Board of Education

Brown vs. Board of Education



 
     Brown vs The Board of Education was a turning point in the history of America, breaking the precedent set by Plessy vs. Ferguson. Signifying a shimmer of hope for true equality in the eyes of so many African Americans. In an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the case and the impact it had on America, the class will go through the process of a mock trial; imitating the parts of this trial and arguing either on the side of Brown or The Board of Education. 

    My team and I were assigned to take the angle of The Board. While there is no logical argument to take in order to support segregation in schools, we had to take ourselves out of this current time period and our own opinions, and travel back to pro-segregation 1954 America. My personal argument is focused on a pathos approach, making a point based upon an emotional platform. 

    For the past 77 years, black and white children have been educated in separate school buildings. This has become comfortable for all parties, being surrounded by children who look like them and think like them allows for growth in the most unimaginable ways. 

    Due to America's long history of slavery and illiteracy among African American's, black children were originally at a disadvantage when education became a plausible opportunity for them. Many of these African American children were surrounded by people who lacked adequate reading, writing, and mathematical skills. Which in turn, would make it harder for these black children to learn and comprehend the necessary skills. Their parents and grandparents were oftentimes not an accessible resource to learn from, because they themselves do not even know the materials. 

    If we were to desegregate schools, and place a racial mix of children into the same classroom it would be a disadvantage to both parties. Black children may feel inferior, due to their need to catch up on classroom skills. This would cause emotional damage, and potentially cause these black students to feel inferior to their white classmates. White children would be disadvantaged in the aspect of their learning would be hindered due to the slowing of overall classroom pace. If white students learning is hindered, it may cause feelings of anger leading to a further divide between the races. White students would go out of their way to push feelings of foolishness and incapability on black students. 

    By continuing racial segregation in the classroom, it gives greater opportunity to both groups of children. Each party can grow and develop at a pace best suited for their capabilities. In an all black classroom, students would not be pressured to quickly master skills that take years to thoroughly understand. White students would be able to quickly go through materials at speeds that black students simply cannot handle. 

    Segregation would also create a more peaceful and welcoming classroom environment. Even Maya Angelou said, "In so many ways, segregation shaped me, educated me, and liberated me." Segregation in schools provides students with the most opportune environment to make the most of themselves. It fosters encouragement, growth, and allows for the deepest forms of learning to take place. 

    While I do not personally believe that segregation should have ever had a place in this world, by proceeding through the formation of a mock trial it allowed for me to have a better sense of the history that was ultimately not too long ago. Defending the side of history that was in the wrong was a difficult side to take, but further informed me of the difficulties African Americans faced in this country. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EOTO Recap - California Reagents v Bakke

 California Reagents v Bakke Mock Trial Recap     In class we had the opportunity to go through the motions of the California Reagents v. Bakke trial. This was a very prominent case, signifying whether affirmative action and minority quotas were Constitutional and would be permitted to continue on within schools and corporations. The case began when Allan Bakke; veteran, NASA intern, and med-school applicant, was denied twice from University of California at Davis. Bakke reportedly had stand out MCAT scores, a high GPA, and decent interviews and was well rounded between the participation in the U.S. Military as well as NASA.      The side of Bakke deemed racial quotas unconstitutional. They said that affirmative action makes it unfair for students who do not fit the certain group standards to be admitted. Based upon solely numerical values such as grades and GPA, Bakke was more than qualified to be admitted to the medical school. Due to...

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts     While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives.  Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery.   The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...

Speech Theories

Speech Theories      Free Speech is monumental and valuable to the American culture; quite frankly, it makes America, America. After evaluating the eight speech theories used by scholars to describe and understand the premise of free speech in the United States, I was able to conclude which was the most valuable to American society. The eight speech theories are, Marketplace of Ideas, Participation in Self-Government, Stable Change, Individual Self Fulfillment, Check on Governmental Power, Promote Tolerance, Promote Innovation, and Protect Dissent. The theory that I found to be most prominent and valuable, was Individual Self Fulfillment.      The speech theory of Individual Self Fulfillment is described as the ability to express one's individuality and create their own identity. This privilege typically allows people to find others with similar likes, dislikes, and interests. This allows people to make meaningful connections resulting in ha...