Skip to main content

Brown vs. Board of Education

Brown vs. Board of Education



 
     Brown vs The Board of Education was a turning point in the history of America, breaking the precedent set by Plessy vs. Ferguson. Signifying a shimmer of hope for true equality in the eyes of so many African Americans. In an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the case and the impact it had on America, the class will go through the process of a mock trial; imitating the parts of this trial and arguing either on the side of Brown or The Board of Education. 

    My team and I were assigned to take the angle of The Board. While there is no logical argument to take in order to support segregation in schools, we had to take ourselves out of this current time period and our own opinions, and travel back to pro-segregation 1954 America. My personal argument is focused on a pathos approach, making a point based upon an emotional platform. 

    For the past 77 years, black and white children have been educated in separate school buildings. This has become comfortable for all parties, being surrounded by children who look like them and think like them allows for growth in the most unimaginable ways. 

    Due to America's long history of slavery and illiteracy among African American's, black children were originally at a disadvantage when education became a plausible opportunity for them. Many of these African American children were surrounded by people who lacked adequate reading, writing, and mathematical skills. Which in turn, would make it harder for these black children to learn and comprehend the necessary skills. Their parents and grandparents were oftentimes not an accessible resource to learn from, because they themselves do not even know the materials. 

    If we were to desegregate schools, and place a racial mix of children into the same classroom it would be a disadvantage to both parties. Black children may feel inferior, due to their need to catch up on classroom skills. This would cause emotional damage, and potentially cause these black students to feel inferior to their white classmates. White children would be disadvantaged in the aspect of their learning would be hindered due to the slowing of overall classroom pace. If white students learning is hindered, it may cause feelings of anger leading to a further divide between the races. White students would go out of their way to push feelings of foolishness and incapability on black students. 

    By continuing racial segregation in the classroom, it gives greater opportunity to both groups of children. Each party can grow and develop at a pace best suited for their capabilities. In an all black classroom, students would not be pressured to quickly master skills that take years to thoroughly understand. White students would be able to quickly go through materials at speeds that black students simply cannot handle. 

    Segregation would also create a more peaceful and welcoming classroom environment. Even Maya Angelou said, "In so many ways, segregation shaped me, educated me, and liberated me." Segregation in schools provides students with the most opportune environment to make the most of themselves. It fosters encouragement, growth, and allows for the deepest forms of learning to take place. 

    While I do not personally believe that segregation should have ever had a place in this world, by proceeding through the formation of a mock trial it allowed for me to have a better sense of the history that was ultimately not too long ago. Defending the side of history that was in the wrong was a difficult side to take, but further informed me of the difficulties African Americans faced in this country. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trespassing Across America

 Trespassing Across America - A Journey to Fight the Pipeline      Ken Ilgunas, an activist and environmentalist trekked the country in hopes of raising awareness for climate change and the dangers of the  Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone XL Pipeline runs for 1,700 miles and spans from Alberta, Canada to Port Arthur, Texas.      This idea of hiking the pipeline was not something Ken originally started out with. Ken explained that he had always been an  environmentalist, and as he watched the world literally burn and begin to fall apart in front of him, he decided he must do something. He was 28 and living in Deadhorse, Alaska with his friend Liam. He was washing dishes and knew that he needed to live a life with an impact. His friend Liam suggested they hike the pipeline, in an attempt to see the environmental impact it caused, firsthand. This idea alone was enough to spark something in Ken. A short time later, he hitchhiked out of Dea...

About Me

 Hi! My name is Abby Weiss. I'm from Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, right in the heart of the Poconos. I am an Exercise Science, Pre-PA major, and hope to become a physician's assist in the ER or a Level 1 Trauma Unit. My main goals while attending High Point is to make the most every opportunity, do well in my classes, and make lasting friendships. I have played softball since I was 9, and I will be playing on High Point's club team. I also enjoy snowboarding, skydiving, hiking, traveling, and anything that has to do with water, or being outside. I hope to travel to all 50 states, right now I have been to 18 of them! I am excited for what High Point has to offer, and the opportunities I create for myself due to that. 

EOTO Recap - California Reagents v Bakke

 California Reagents v Bakke Mock Trial Recap     In class we had the opportunity to go through the motions of the California Reagents v. Bakke trial. This was a very prominent case, signifying whether affirmative action and minority quotas were Constitutional and would be permitted to continue on within schools and corporations. The case began when Allan Bakke; veteran, NASA intern, and med-school applicant, was denied twice from University of California at Davis. Bakke reportedly had stand out MCAT scores, a high GPA, and decent interviews and was well rounded between the participation in the U.S. Military as well as NASA.      The side of Bakke deemed racial quotas unconstitutional. They said that affirmative action makes it unfair for students who do not fit the certain group standards to be admitted. Based upon solely numerical values such as grades and GPA, Bakke was more than qualified to be admitted to the medical school. Due to...