State vs. Mann - State Side

In class, we debated the State vs. Mann case, which regards a slave being beat and shot at by the person who is renting her. My group and I were on the State Side of the debate, arguing that Mann should be held accountable for injuring said slave and should be forced to pay his fine. Our argument was structured upon the basis that due to Mann renting Lydia, and her not being his property, he was simply assaulting her.

The State vs. Mann case as a whole dealt with John Mann, from North Carolina, who had rented a slave named Lydia. Lydia was referred to as "disobedient" and in order to handle this, Mann began beating her. In an attempt to avoid the beating, Lydia started running. Mann shot at Lydia while she was running away, and hit her in the back, injuring her. Mann was fined ten dollars, and felt as though he should not be held responsible for paying the fine. The case then worked its way through the system and landed in the Supreme Court.

For my personal argument, I based it on ethics. The issue at hand was, Mann abused and attempted to murder Lydia, and expected to face zero punishment. By allowing Mann to be refunded his ten dollar fine, it disregards Lydia as any sort of human being. Even if we regard Lydia as property, she was not being beaten by her owner, she was being beaten by a renter. If this was spoken about with true property such as a house, the renter would be liable for destruction they commit on the home they are renting. This point alone should have held Mann responsible for the destruction of Lydia's physical body.

Ethically, the ruling was incorrect. Lydia was being harmed by someone who was not even her owner, meaning he had no rights over her. By diminishing Lydia as a person and allowing Mann to not pay his fine, it creates a concept that allows for non-slave owners to potentially have the right to harm slaves that are not theirs. Along with that, the case went against a precedenting case. The preceding case regarded a man who had committed a ruthless crime against his own slave. He was therefore fined and punished by law. Due to the common practice of following precedenting case rulings, the State vs. Mann case should have also held John Mann accountable for the battering and attempted murder of Lydia.

Comments

Theme Song

Theme Song Music has played a very major role in my life. Many memories, both good and bad, have a musical association for me. I think when you take the time to understand the lyrics of the song, you can find out more about yourself and your views on life. When trying to choose a theme song, I struggled with selecting just one. I believe that I embody many aspects of various songs and genres, and am grateful that I am capable of seeing parts of myself in a multitude of lights. I love to travel, my bags are always packed, and the feeling of freedom is something so pivotal to who I am. I believe there's more to life than the sole aspect of working day in and day out. I also am a strong believer in the idea that you can learn more through travel, than in a classroom. In that aspect, I do not mean traveling to five star resorts and luxurious beaches, I mean travel to touch every part of the world; the good, the bad, and the ugly, meet a variety of people, ...

EOTO - The Fair Housing Act of 1968

The Fair Housing Act of 1968 Prior to The Fair Housing Act of 1968, African Americans, in addition to many other minority groups, were being denied basic housing rights. These denials resulted in difficulty finding housing in decent, let alone desirable locations. Minority groups struggled when it came to buying and renting homes. Landlords and sellers would raise prices, set different terms of agreement, use different qualification criteria, or simply refuse to allow these people to live in the available houses due to things such as race, sex, or religion. Prior to the passing of The Fair Housing Act of 1968, two previous versions of this law were rejected by Congress. The rejection of the two prior versions lead people to believe that a third try at passing the law would be an incredibly long shot. After the assignation of MLK things really took a turn. On April 11, 1968 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1968...

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives. Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...

Abby Weiss

Search This Blog