Skip to main content

State vs. Mann - State Side

    

In class, we debated the State vs. Mann case, which regards a slave being beat and shot at by the person who is renting her. My group and I were on the State Side of the debate, arguing that Mann should be held accountable for injuring said slave and should be forced to pay his fine. Our argument was structured upon the basis that due to Mann renting Lydia, and her not being his property, he was simply assaulting her. 

    The State vs. Mann case as a whole dealt with John Mann, from North Carolina, who had rented a slave named Lydia. Lydia was referred to as "disobedient" and in order to handle this, Mann began beating her. In an attempt to avoid the beating, Lydia started running. Mann shot at Lydia while she was running away, and hit her in the back, injuring her. Mann was fined ten dollars, and felt as though he should not be held responsible for paying the fine. The case then worked its way through the system and landed in the Supreme Court.

    For my personal argument, I based it on ethics. The issue at hand was, Mann abused and attempted to murder Lydia, and expected to face zero punishment. By allowing Mann to be refunded his ten dollar fine, it disregards Lydia as any sort of human being. Even if we regard Lydia as property, she was not being beaten by her owner, she was being beaten by a renter. If this was spoken about with true property such as a house, the renter would be liable for destruction they commit on the home they are renting. This point alone should have held Mann responsible for the destruction of Lydia's physical body. 

    Ethically, the ruling was incorrect. Lydia was being harmed by someone who was not even her owner, meaning he had no rights over her. By diminishing Lydia as a person and allowing Mann to not pay his fine, it creates a concept that allows for non-slave owners to potentially have the right to harm slaves that are not theirs. Along with that, the case went against a precedenting case. The preceding case regarded a man who had committed a ruthless crime against his own slave. He was therefore fined and punished by law. Due to the common practice of following precedenting case rulings, the State vs. Mann case should have also held John Mann accountable for the battering and attempted murder of Lydia. 

    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Speech Theories

Speech Theories      Free Speech is monumental and valuable to the American culture; quite frankly, it makes America, America. After evaluating the eight speech theories used by scholars to describe and understand the premise of free speech in the United States, I was able to conclude which was the most valuable to American society. The eight speech theories are, Marketplace of Ideas, Participation in Self-Government, Stable Change, Individual Self Fulfillment, Check on Governmental Power, Promote Tolerance, Promote Innovation, and Protect Dissent. The theory that I found to be most prominent and valuable, was Individual Self Fulfillment.      The speech theory of Individual Self Fulfillment is described as the ability to express one's individuality and create their own identity. This privilege typically allows people to find others with similar likes, dislikes, and interests. This allows people to make meaningful connections resulting in ha...

News Sources

 With so many available news sources literally right at our fingertips, it's important to understand the validity of each source. By taking a deeper look into the places we get our news from, it allows us to have a clearer picture of how the facts we read may be altered, skewed, or changed to fit a certain agenda. Some news sources are more reliable, straight-forward, and clear cut than others, these are the ideal sources. Below are five places I receive news from, and a short conclusion regarding each. 1. NewsBreak I primarily receive a lot of news from the NewsBreak app. This app is relatively unknown, it provides a lot of local smaller stories. It allows for me to still feel connected to my home town while being eight hours away. Due to NewsBreak focusing on a lot of smaller news stories, it is easy to miss some of the major worldly events happening. Along with that, since it is relatively unknown, I am unsure how reliable this news source is. 2. Facebook With apps like Facebook...

Trespassing Across America

 Trespassing Across America - A Journey to Fight the Pipeline      Ken Ilgunas, an activist and environmentalist trekked the country in hopes of raising awareness for climate change and the dangers of the  Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone XL Pipeline runs for 1,700 miles and spans from Alberta, Canada to Port Arthur, Texas.      This idea of hiking the pipeline was not something Ken originally started out with. Ken explained that he had always been an  environmentalist, and as he watched the world literally burn and begin to fall apart in front of him, he decided he must do something. He was 28 and living in Deadhorse, Alaska with his friend Liam. He was washing dishes and knew that he needed to live a life with an impact. His friend Liam suggested they hike the pipeline, in an attempt to see the environmental impact it caused, firsthand. This idea alone was enough to spark something in Ken. A short time later, he hitchhiked out of Dea...