Skip to main content

EOTO - Lynching

 Lynching

        From the years of 1882 to 1968 there were roughly 4,743 lynchings of blacks in the United States. Lynching was a very popular means of unauthorized execution during this time period. Typically lynching was a crime committed against African Americans, but there are many instances where the act was committed against whites as well, prior to the determination of their guilt regarding an accusation. Lynchings were never federal crimes, and it wasn't until 2018 that the Senate passed an anti-lynching bill. This devastating and destructive happening taunted blacks and opposing whites for all too long. 

    Lynching is defined as the killing of a person through mob action, without legal approval. The victim would be accused of a crime, and not receive proper due process, but be executed regardless. The sequence of order for these lynchings, was often something along the lines of an initial criminal accusation, followed by an arrest which then led to the assembly of a mob who took it upon themselves to seize the victim, torture them, and therefore proceed to kill said person. These executions were again, not court ordered. There was no true investigation into the honesty of the trial regarding each accusation. Many of the people lynched may have been completely innocent of the crime they had been accused of, but killed anyway. 

    The lynchings occurred in public areas, and were frequently advertised in order to draw a crowd. In some aspects, these lynchings were a form of entertainment. In photos, you can see families gathered at lynchings with small children, simply just to watch. Lynchings were also written about and published in newspapers across the nation; but, not in a way to warn you of them, but rather to bring about positive attention and entertainment. Published in The New York World Telegram, an article was titled "Negro Is Slain By Texas Posse: Victims Heart Removed After His Capture By Armed Men". The article then went on to speak of the detailed and gruesome activities performed to the seized man. Articles depicting the lynchings were were not hard to come by, they were in both national newspapers as well as local ones. 

    The purpose of lynching was to instill a great fear in the black population in order to gain control. After slavery had ended, insecure and overbearing whites took it upon themselves to still find a way to feel superior. The way they achieved this was to kill potentially innocent blacks through the practice of lynching. The fear of being lynched prevented blacks from voting, obtaining basic human rights, or even seeking employment. It was also known that blacks who became powerful and successful were also at risk of being lynched due to some white folks fear that they lose power at the gain of someone else's. Along with that, whites who spoke out against the lynching of black people were also at great risk of being lynched. Overall, the main purpose of lynching was to have a sense of power and control. 

    In the early 1900's, people began to speak out against the practice of lynching. Ida B. Wells-Barnett was a leader in efforts to reduce violence against blacks. She was a journalist and civil-rights militant. There were national efforts to eliminate lynching. Some of these efforts include the NAACP flying a flag outside their New York City Headquarters after every reported lynching, protesting, and the accumulation and publishing of statistics. The flag that the NAACP flew read, "A Man Was Lynched Yesterday", this went on to be a slogan used to fight against lynching and represent the powerful black community willing to fight for rights and justice. The protest spanned across the country and even occurred in Washington, D.C. When data was published regarding lynching, it drew attention to just how much unjust killing was happening. This drew in a lot of support for abolishing the practice of lynching. 

    As blacks established more respect and further gained rights, the practice of lynching began to decrease. Through the efforts of those stand out citizens such as Ida B. Wells, the general black community, and inclusive whites, lynching finally became outlawed. 

























Comments

Popular posts from this blog

EOTO Recap - California Reagents v Bakke

 California Reagents v Bakke Mock Trial Recap     In class we had the opportunity to go through the motions of the California Reagents v. Bakke trial. This was a very prominent case, signifying whether affirmative action and minority quotas were Constitutional and would be permitted to continue on within schools and corporations. The case began when Allan Bakke; veteran, NASA intern, and med-school applicant, was denied twice from University of California at Davis. Bakke reportedly had stand out MCAT scores, a high GPA, and decent interviews and was well rounded between the participation in the U.S. Military as well as NASA.      The side of Bakke deemed racial quotas unconstitutional. They said that affirmative action makes it unfair for students who do not fit the certain group standards to be admitted. Based upon solely numerical values such as grades and GPA, Bakke was more than qualified to be admitted to the medical school. Due to...

EOTO Recap

Pro vs. Anti Slavery - EOTO Facts     While going through the times of history, it is quite easy to see the two sides of many issues. When it came to slavery, the sides were vocal and apparent. Each side made advanced on their case, allowing for each side to further progress regarding its motives.  Pro slavery was raging in the south. Southerners claimed that slavery was ethical, constitutional, and good for the economy. In order to push their point further, pro-slavery folk created crafty and even law abiding ways to advance their goal of making the United States a country of slavery.   The Kansas-Nebraska Act was enacted in 1854. It created two new territories, Kansas and Nebraska. These territories allowed for popular sovereignty in regards to slavery, meaning the people inhabiting the land chose if slavery was going to be allowed there or not. This ability to choose whether slavery was going to legal or illegal in the territories caused a major pushback from the...

Speech Theories

Speech Theories      Free Speech is monumental and valuable to the American culture; quite frankly, it makes America, America. After evaluating the eight speech theories used by scholars to describe and understand the premise of free speech in the United States, I was able to conclude which was the most valuable to American society. The eight speech theories are, Marketplace of Ideas, Participation in Self-Government, Stable Change, Individual Self Fulfillment, Check on Governmental Power, Promote Tolerance, Promote Innovation, and Protect Dissent. The theory that I found to be most prominent and valuable, was Individual Self Fulfillment.      The speech theory of Individual Self Fulfillment is described as the ability to express one's individuality and create their own identity. This privilege typically allows people to find others with similar likes, dislikes, and interests. This allows people to make meaningful connections resulting in ha...